While many companies, including banks and airlines, are dropping mandates involving COVID inoculations, the fight for bodily autonomy persists elsewhere, including the armed forces (9 min read.)
I think Africa is ahead of us. They stopped all this nonsense months ago. The doctors and researchers hopefully will look into running their facilities and activities without the big pharma industries. Getting tied to this money was a tragedy. I hope we can unravel some of it,?????, and get back to doctoring and scientific debate.
Thank you for your comment. Indeed, getting tied to this money was a tragedy. Many independent researchers and physicians who are not tied to federal programs or funding from health agencies (such as the NIH) have the luxury to carry out objective, scientific research without a biased agenda looming over their shoulders. We are in a very sorry situation. Even questioning doctors find themselves in a tightened situation where they prioritize their reputation and, without judgment, the resultant income supporting their family.
Thank you for commenting. Yes, actions speak volumes. Although one positive is that fewer Americans are taking the COVID booster shot than the initial two-jab protocol, there is still so much work to be done to topple these mandates altogether.
Yes, I agree. The truth is leaking out and people are waking up, or at least the ones who have that ability. Some people are just blind followers and order takers, there is no fix for that. Sorry to sound a bit like Darwin here. Took my grands to music practice yesterday and one of the girls was wearing a mask inside and out.😵💫
I do think we have turned the corner in regard to the general public.
"The EUAs for both the Pfizer/BioNTech and Moderna mRNA experimental injections and any other EUA vaccine require fact sheets to be given to vaccination providers and recipients. These fact sheets make clear that getting the vaccine is optional. For example, the one for recipients states, “It is your choice to receive or not receive the COVID-19 vaccine,” and if “you decide to not receive it, it will not change your standard of medical care.”
Thank you for commenting. The EUAs for the Pfizer/BioNTech and Moderna mRNA injections would never have been given the thumbs-up if available alternative medications were shown to prevent or suppress infection of this "novel coronavirus." effectively. Numerous independent studies have been conducted to demonstrate the benefits of ivermectin and hydroxychloroquine for the treatment of this reported disease. But any cheap alternative treatments are a direct conflict of interest for Big Pharma and the normalization of mandating invasive injections just to to work and attend a concert, just to live our lives.
Oct 7, 2022·edited Oct 7, 2022Liked by Dear Rest Of America
About 20 years ago I was working for a business consulting firm, a nationwide firm, that specialized in small to medium sized businesses. One of the things I noticed in my consulting was there was a large number of these small to medium businesses that did contract work for the US gov. One of the main contract granting criteria was it had to be a minority owned business. This lead to many straw business owners. Women and especially women of color that owned the business in name only, their husbands or boy friends actually ran the business and the minority owned criteria gave them an in to getting those lucrative government contracts.
I think many larger businesses have government contracts, as part of their business model. In these cases, the business mandating jabs takes priority over employee health, money talks. The small to medium businesses that grew with government contract naturally mandated jabs. It was a good plan by those in power.
I think Africa is ahead of us. They stopped all this nonsense months ago. The doctors and researchers hopefully will look into running their facilities and activities without the big pharma industries. Getting tied to this money was a tragedy. I hope we can unravel some of it,?????, and get back to doctoring and scientific debate.
Thank you for your comment. Indeed, getting tied to this money was a tragedy. Many independent researchers and physicians who are not tied to federal programs or funding from health agencies (such as the NIH) have the luxury to carry out objective, scientific research without a biased agenda looming over their shoulders. We are in a very sorry situation. Even questioning doctors find themselves in a tightened situation where they prioritize their reputation and, without judgment, the resultant income supporting their family.
I think “they” are trying to destroy the U.S. military. Otherwise none of what has gone on with the military in the last few years makes any sense.
The old adage in politics comes into play here, " Watch what they do and not what they say". Actions always speak louder than words.
Thank you for commenting. Yes, actions speak volumes. Although one positive is that fewer Americans are taking the COVID booster shot than the initial two-jab protocol, there is still so much work to be done to topple these mandates altogether.
Yes, I agree. The truth is leaking out and people are waking up, or at least the ones who have that ability. Some people are just blind followers and order takers, there is no fix for that. Sorry to sound a bit like Darwin here. Took my grands to music practice yesterday and one of the girls was wearing a mask inside and out.😵💫
I do think we have turned the corner in regard to the general public.
"The EUAs for both the Pfizer/BioNTech and Moderna mRNA experimental injections and any other EUA vaccine require fact sheets to be given to vaccination providers and recipients. These fact sheets make clear that getting the vaccine is optional. For example, the one for recipients states, “It is your choice to receive or not receive the COVID-19 vaccine,” and if “you decide to not receive it, it will not change your standard of medical care.”
So how did this get so out of control?
Thank you for commenting. The EUAs for the Pfizer/BioNTech and Moderna mRNA injections would never have been given the thumbs-up if available alternative medications were shown to prevent or suppress infection of this "novel coronavirus." effectively. Numerous independent studies have been conducted to demonstrate the benefits of ivermectin and hydroxychloroquine for the treatment of this reported disease. But any cheap alternative treatments are a direct conflict of interest for Big Pharma and the normalization of mandating invasive injections just to to work and attend a concert, just to live our lives.
About 20 years ago I was working for a business consulting firm, a nationwide firm, that specialized in small to medium sized businesses. One of the things I noticed in my consulting was there was a large number of these small to medium businesses that did contract work for the US gov. One of the main contract granting criteria was it had to be a minority owned business. This lead to many straw business owners. Women and especially women of color that owned the business in name only, their husbands or boy friends actually ran the business and the minority owned criteria gave them an in to getting those lucrative government contracts.
I think many larger businesses have government contracts, as part of their business model. In these cases, the business mandating jabs takes priority over employee health, money talks. The small to medium businesses that grew with government contract naturally mandated jabs. It was a good plan by those in power.
Thank you for sharing this insightful information!
Except nutty Kali where Newsom just reinforced the Covid mandates. And the nuts will re-elect him.
Thank you for commenting. How confident can we be about elections versus selections at this stage in the United States?