AI-generated data that exhibits the same characteristics as patients treated with new medicine is part of the World Economic Forum's (WEF's) ambition to "revolutionize global healthcare" (8 min read.)
They already have artificial clinical trials with artificial results so why not go the whole hog and have artificial patients. Makes sense if you are a psychopath.
From no real data, no long term trials, corrupted results, hidden side effects to now artificial patients. They can spin their lies quicker and push their dangerous drugs and vaccines, but we all must say NO.
Drawing an analogy here, it sounds to me like the same nonsense as climate models which for the most part start from pre ordained conclusions so arrive at the desired results with no resemblance to reality or science.
The problem with this stupid idea is most people will actually think “it sure is high tech duhhhh” or not even give a damn. There are a lot of stupids and lazy out there.
Subtly: cleverly and indirectly, difficult to notice.
Sadly, the term "being Human" is becoming obsolete. Subtly being replaced with, "being artificial". Meaning, that Al (the wicked) is quietly making the artificial more important than humans, and this my dear friends is evil.
"The LORD sustains the humble but casts the wicked to the ground." Psalm 147:6 NIV.
Even the most creative science fiction, writer could not have come up with a scenario as weird as this. We are heading into some uncharted waters, and it’s going to be a very strange world here real soon.
This is news to me! I imagine trial results would be easier to manipulate or "fix" in the manufacturer's favor this way. What's next? Artificial evidence for criminal trials?
Nice, now they will use artificial patients to base our treatment on. If it worked on them, it surely will work on us, and they can prescribe their poisonous drugs on us at will.
Great article about fake science and fake diseases and fake studies of fake drugs and fake governmental agencies full of fallen fearful idolatrous humans.
Let’s unpack the following statement a bit.
““supposedly “change the way clinical trials are performed in common and rare diseases, lowering their cost and improving how new treatments are tested.”
“the way clinical trials are performed”
are part the maker (examples Pfizer, Moderna etc.) of the pharmaceutical product under study in the “clinical trial” overall plan for the product assuming the product successfully passes, not fails, all three of the phases of a “clinical trial.”
The way a “clinical trial” is performed is a moot point or a nonstarter if the clinical trial is not a clinical trial at all, to begin with.
The “clinical trials” of ALL of the BigPharma companies brands of ’ “COVID-19 vaccines”were not what “clinical trials” are or at least not what “clinical trials” are purported to be. There are honest “real” clinical trials and there are fake “lie” clinical trials. And there are real clinical trials that are honestly sloppy clinical trials. And there are deliberately “sloppy” clinical trials that are fraudulent clinical trials. “Fraud vitiates everything”, legally speaking that is.
“performed in common and rare diseases”
COVID-19 is claimed to be the disease condition caused by SARS-CoV-2. SARS CoV-2 is purported to be a “novel zoonotic virus of the corona virus kind”
The product under study, the “vaccine” formula under study in the “clinical trial” is supposed to contain a bit of the actual SARS-CoV 2 pathogen purported to be the “pathogen from nature” upon which the vaccine formula was based.
That is which there needed to be some word crafting on the word “vaccines” and the terms “clinical trial” and “from nature” because no study anywhere of any kind on any “COVID-19 vaccine”product has used any part, any genetic sequence of the SARS-CoV 2 pathogen. That is why the definitions of “vaccine” and “virus” changed a few times over the progression of the “pandemic”. There are no actual squishy specimens of SARS-CoV-2, only squishy definitions of words and terms. And that is one of the reasons why the term “SARS CoV-2” can be questioned and debated to be “not a virus” and “not a ‘from nature’ pathogen. Just give words and phrases word labels according to what you want them to be understood as. (Dr. Michael Yeadon PhD gave particular note to the descripter term applied for SARS-CoV-2, “novel”, meaning new, not common and rare.)
I won’t even get started on safety and efficacy.
God bless us each and every one in the Name of the One Who is Truth.
Every day I try to remember the name of that science fiction story about the planet where everyone is insane and no one recognizes this fact because everyone is insane. Is there such a story? Or are we collectively creating that story?
This is very interesting! Surprising myself, I did not immediately react negatively to the notion of substituting artificial for real patients in clinical trials. In the hierarchy of medical evils, it seems less evil than running a clinical trial on five billion real people, as the covidians did. I'll have to re-read and think more on this, but even given the horrible WEF provenance of the developers of AI-driven clinical trials, perhaps some good could come out of that particular brand of evil?
And the wicked will continue to be wicked because they are blind to the truth. Artificial intelligence is not all that smart... but they don't care. So sad what things have come to.
They already have artificial clinical trials with artificial results so why not go the whole hog and have artificial patients. Makes sense if you are a psychopath.
From no real data, no long term trials, corrupted results, hidden side effects to now artificial patients. They can spin their lies quicker and push their dangerous drugs and vaccines, but we all must say NO.
Only our Big Pharma could come up with this.
But with 'increased profits' the sky is the limit.
Drawing an analogy here, it sounds to me like the same nonsense as climate models which for the most part start from pre ordained conclusions so arrive at the desired results with no resemblance to reality or science.
Big Pharma and the WEF live in a fantasy world unrelated to human health and well-being.
The problem with this stupid idea is most people will actually think “it sure is high tech duhhhh” or not even give a damn. There are a lot of stupids and lazy out there.
SNUFF WEF
Subtly: cleverly and indirectly, difficult to notice.
Sadly, the term "being Human" is becoming obsolete. Subtly being replaced with, "being artificial". Meaning, that Al (the wicked) is quietly making the artificial more important than humans, and this my dear friends is evil.
"The LORD sustains the humble but casts the wicked to the ground." Psalm 147:6 NIV.
Even the most creative science fiction, writer could not have come up with a scenario as weird as this. We are heading into some uncharted waters, and it’s going to be a very strange world here real soon.
This is news to me! I imagine trial results would be easier to manipulate or "fix" in the manufacturer's favor this way. What's next? Artificial evidence for criminal trials?
Nice, now they will use artificial patients to base our treatment on. If it worked on them, it surely will work on us, and they can prescribe their poisonous drugs on us at will.
At least for those willing to take them
Insane! A script can be generated for any desired outcome. Hence all this is useless. We’re on our own humans!
Great article about fake science and fake diseases and fake studies of fake drugs and fake governmental agencies full of fallen fearful idolatrous humans.
Let’s unpack the following statement a bit.
““supposedly “change the way clinical trials are performed in common and rare diseases, lowering their cost and improving how new treatments are tested.”
“the way clinical trials are performed”
are part the maker (examples Pfizer, Moderna etc.) of the pharmaceutical product under study in the “clinical trial” overall plan for the product assuming the product successfully passes, not fails, all three of the phases of a “clinical trial.”
The way a “clinical trial” is performed is a moot point or a nonstarter if the clinical trial is not a clinical trial at all, to begin with.
The “clinical trials” of ALL of the BigPharma companies brands of ’ “COVID-19 vaccines”were not what “clinical trials” are or at least not what “clinical trials” are purported to be. There are honest “real” clinical trials and there are fake “lie” clinical trials. And there are real clinical trials that are honestly sloppy clinical trials. And there are deliberately “sloppy” clinical trials that are fraudulent clinical trials. “Fraud vitiates everything”, legally speaking that is.
“performed in common and rare diseases”
COVID-19 is claimed to be the disease condition caused by SARS-CoV-2. SARS CoV-2 is purported to be a “novel zoonotic virus of the corona virus kind”
The product under study, the “vaccine” formula under study in the “clinical trial” is supposed to contain a bit of the actual SARS-CoV 2 pathogen purported to be the “pathogen from nature” upon which the vaccine formula was based.
That is which there needed to be some word crafting on the word “vaccines” and the terms “clinical trial” and “from nature” because no study anywhere of any kind on any “COVID-19 vaccine”product has used any part, any genetic sequence of the SARS-CoV 2 pathogen. That is why the definitions of “vaccine” and “virus” changed a few times over the progression of the “pandemic”. There are no actual squishy specimens of SARS-CoV-2, only squishy definitions of words and terms. And that is one of the reasons why the term “SARS CoV-2” can be questioned and debated to be “not a virus” and “not a ‘from nature’ pathogen. Just give words and phrases word labels according to what you want them to be understood as. (Dr. Michael Yeadon PhD gave particular note to the descripter term applied for SARS-CoV-2, “novel”, meaning new, not common and rare.)
I won’t even get started on safety and efficacy.
God bless us each and every one in the Name of the One Who is Truth.
Every day I try to remember the name of that science fiction story about the planet where everyone is insane and no one recognizes this fact because everyone is insane. Is there such a story? Or are we collectively creating that story?
This is very interesting! Surprising myself, I did not immediately react negatively to the notion of substituting artificial for real patients in clinical trials. In the hierarchy of medical evils, it seems less evil than running a clinical trial on five billion real people, as the covidians did. I'll have to re-read and think more on this, but even given the horrible WEF provenance of the developers of AI-driven clinical trials, perhaps some good could come out of that particular brand of evil?
And the wicked will continue to be wicked because they are blind to the truth. Artificial intelligence is not all that smart... but they don't care. So sad what things have come to.